Iran’s Misty Wonders Essay

In Persepolis, by Marjane Satrapi, some(prenominal) the moving picture and the restrain were equal to portray the main opinion of Marjane Satrapi Marjis life. The main idea universe for us to look at how Marji evolved into a gr give birth women with struggles along the way. Through pop out both we were able to clearly understand what a difficult childhood she lived and we were able to sound a sense of what her life was analogous(p) back then. Like in some cases, the carry informed us of solely(prenominal) detail possible in bless to get a cle arr message across. When it came to the movie, it lacked numerous exposit that were include in the record hold back and if you would non use up read the oblige it would cause you to be confused and lost. in that respect ar a couple scenes in the movie that seem to just happen, in that location was no type of development or leading actions involved. There was a special scene in the movie where Marji and her give walk pas t a colloquy that her let and neighbors are having, the female neighbor seems to have some type of chump in her cheek just now we are not sure what it is and if it thus far matters. If we support a look at the view as we see that the scene is different. Marji and her family out front long clack with their neighbors, a husband and wife, and the husband tells her father Look A bullet about hit my wifes cheek, (44).This was a piece of information that could and should have been briefly added because it gives us a bigger return of how dangerous their lives were during the revolution. This would only help us, the viewers, have a bigger reaction to the plot. anformer(a)(prenominal) example that comes to mind was the absence of legitimate characters. The familys maid, Mehri, as well as Marjis good friend, is never mentioned in the movie. This was an important factor because passim an chance that is draw in the book we are able to observe the big issues with controlty cla ss and in the movie it is something that we drip out on since it is not mentioned at all. The incident was that Mehri falls in hunch over with the neighbors son and once Marjis father have sexs of this he tells Hossein, the neighbors son, that she is a maid therefore Hossein decided to detail seeing her. Marjis Father explains to Marji, You must(prenominal) understand that their love was impossible.Because in this rural area you must stay within your own social class, (37). Many of the characters are too lacked full explanation, for instance, Mohsen, and Anoosh. From the movie all we hear about Mohsen is that he is found drowned in a bath tub and it leaves many unanswered questions such as wherefore did it happen and who was he. In the book we know that he visited the Satrapi family the same day that Siamak visits but that is never portrayed in the movie.When it comes to Anoosh, in the movie towards the end of the fib he is telling Marji, she asks if he has any family, an d ends the conversation. On the other hand, in the book he tells Marji I married and had cardinal children, two girls And we are also able to learn that his marriage did not turn out very well. Although, there were many expatiate missing in the movie that were included in the book, I do not think that it takes away the intention of the book. A message is clearly stated finishedout the movie as well as the book. In both resources we are able to see how the main character grows up and how her surroundings, and everything she has experienced, influence the person she became. In my private opinion I witness as if the book was more appealing than the movie. The movie was short and brief and got to the main points of the story and was even so able to get a message across. I feel as if the book was more detailed which do the plot clearer. Every character was described perfectly and every scene make sense and fell into place with the other scenes, so that they could all make sense. The details that are included in the book make the story bring more emotion to the reader for the fact that everything is explained, even the smallest details. The visual style for the movie was the same as the book, both were comics. The movie is all cartoons, which is something that I found interesting. I feel that making it into a cartoon was a smart decision because it makes it so impartial and easy to follow. I enjoyed the fact that I was able to understand the movie very well, although it was in French, because many of the scenes were similar to the book. In the end, I think both the book and movie were enjoyable. What helped was that I had read the novel, before watching the movie. The lack of details and description of characters could have easily confused someone. On the bright side, a message was still able to get across through both sources.